|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- Congresul consacrat aniversării a 75-a de la fondarea Universității de Stat de Medicină și Farmacie „Nicolae Testemițanu” din Republica Moldova
- Culegere de postere
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/12684
Title: | Efficiency of amniotic membrane transplantation in the management of limbal stem cell deficiency |
Authors: | Procopciuc, Vitalie Mihaluța, Viorica Ignatov, Olga Cușnir, Valeriu Nacu, Viorel |
Keywords: | amniotic membrane;cornea;limbal stem cell deficiency;limbal graft |
Issue Date: | Oct-2020 |
Publisher: | Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie "Nicolae Testemiţanu" |
Abstract: | Introduction
Limbal stem cells (LSC) have the function of regenerating
corneal epithelial cells, as well as maintaining the
integrity of the corneal epithelium. Various ocular
pathologies can affect the limbal region, causing lymbal
stem cell dysfunction (LSCD). All cases of moderate to
severe LSCD require surgical management. The main
directions of its surgical treatment are: direct limbal
tissue transplantation and ex vivo/in vivo expanded LSC
transplantation. The amniotic membrane (AM), used
alone or as a substrate for LSC, can be incorporated into
LSC transplantation in almost all surgical approaches.
Purpose
To analyze the current data on applications of AM in the
surgical management of limbal stem cell deficiency and to
summarize the results of various surgical approaches.
Material and methods
A systematic search was performed on PubMed for papers
published until February 2020, using combinations of the
following search terms: "amniotic membrane", "limbal
stem cell deficiency", "limbal transplantation",
"conjunctival limbal auto-/allograft", ” keratolimbal
allograft”. The data on AM preparation, as well as surgical
techniques and clinical results was collected and
analyzed.
Results
1. Isolated AM transplantation (AMT)
We selected 7 studies that reported results of isolated
AMT in the treatment of partial LSCD (Table 1). Stable
epithelial surface was maintained during a period of 12-
25 months after surgery. Nonetheless, the success rate of
AMT alone in patients with LSCD was only 31% at over a
50 months follow-up period.
2. Transplantation of limbal tissues combined with
AM
A total of 15 studies were selected for the analysis of the
outcome of CLAU or CLAL (Table 2). No notable difference
was reported between CLAU and CLAU combined with
AMT, but there was a greater re-epithelization time when
AMT was used alone. AMT is being actively used as a
common procedure in direct limbal tissue transplantation
for its healing properties and to increase graft survival
rate.
3. Transplantation of ex vivo expanded LSC on AM
A total of 23 studies were selected for the analysis of the
outcome of CLET and COMET combined with AM
substrate. The rejection rate of CLET was relatively low
even when allogenic tissue was used, thanks to the small
size of transplanted tissue, and the rate of success was
stable even after one year. Similarly, the successful rate of
COMET was stable two years after surgery.
Conclusions
Preliminary results of the application of AM in limbal
transplantation show quite satisfactory data, but the lack
of high-level studies, such as randomized controlled
clinical trials, make it difficult to assess the comparative
efficacy of AM transplantation in the surgical management
of LSCD. And although studies have consistently reported
favorable outcomes of different LSC transplantation
techniques combined with AMT, it is unclear at the
moment what is the role of the AM specifically and to
what extent it impacts the final result. |
URI: | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12684 |
Appears in Collections: | Culegere de postere
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|