|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- REVISTE MEDICALE NEINSTITUȚIONALE
- Buletin de Perinatologie
- Buletin de Perinatologie 2017
- Buletin de Perinatologie Nr. 4(76) 2017
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/17675
Title: | Evaluating progestogens for prevention of preterm birth international collaborative (EPPPIC) individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: protocol |
Authors: | Stewart, Lesley A. Simmonds, Mark Duley, Lelia Dietz, Kristina Charlotte Harden, Melissa Hodkinson, Alex Llewellyn, Alexis Sharif, Sahar Walker, Ruth Wright, Kath |
Keywords: | Preterm birth;Progestogen;Individual participant data;IPD;Meta-analysis |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
Publisher: | Instituţia Medico-Sanitară Publică Institutul Mamei și Copilului |
Citation: | STEWART, Lesley A., SIMMONDS, Mark, DULEY, Lelia, et al. Evaluating progestogens for prevention of preterm birth international collaborative (EPPPIC) individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis: protocol. In: Buletin de perinatologie. 2017, nr. 4(76), pp. 61-76. ISSN 1810-5289. |
Abstract: | Background: Preterm birth is the most common cause of death and harm to newborn babies. Babies that are born
early may have difficulties at birth and experience health problems during early childhood. Despite extensive study,
there is still uncertainty about the effectiveness of progestogen (medications that are similar to the natural hormone
progesterone) in preventing or delaying preterm birth, and in improving birth outcomes. The Evaluating Progestogen
for Prevention of Preterm birth International Collaborative (EPPPIC) project aims to reduce uncertainty about the
specific conditions in which progestogen may (or may not) be effective in preventing or delaying preterm birth and
improving birth outcomes.
Methods: The design of the study involves international collaborative individual participant data meta-analysis
comprising systematic review, re-analysis, and synthesis of trial datasets.
Inclusion criteria are as follows: randomized controlled trials comparing progestogen versus placebo or nonintervention, or comparing different types of progestogen, in asymptomatic women at risk of preterm birth. Main outcomes are as follows; fetal/infant death, preterm birth or fetal death (<=37 weeks, <=34 weeks, <= 28 weeks), serious
neonatal complications or fetal/infant death, neurosensory disability (measured at 18 months or later) or infant/child
death, important maternal morbidity, or maternal death. In statistical methods, IPD will be synthesized across trials
using meta-analysis. Both ‘two-stage’ models (where effect estimates are calculated for each trial and subsequently
pooled in a meta-analysis) and ‘one-stage’ models (where all IPD from all trials are analyzed in one step, while accounting for the clustering of participants within trials) will be used. If sufficient suitable data are available, a network
meta-analysis will compare all types of progesterone and routes of administration extending the one-stage models to
include multiple treatment arms.
Discussion: EPPPIC is an international collaborative project being conducted by the forming EPPPIC group,
which includes trial investigators, an international secretariat, and the research project team. Results, which are intended to contribute to improvements in maternal and child health, are expected to be publicly available in mid 2018. |
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: | Buletin de perinatologie |
URI: | https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/j_nr_file/Buletin%20de%20Perinatologie_4_2017.pdf http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/17675 |
ISSN: | 1810-5289 |
Appears in Collections: | Buletin de Perinatologie Nr. 4(76) 2017
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|