|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2014
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/18432
Title: | Variability of the extracranian branches of the facial nerve (Morphoclinical aspects) |
Authors: | Fuştei, Eugenia Fuştei, Roman Gînju, Nadia Cigoreanu, Elena |
Issue Date: | 2014 |
Publisher: | Ministry of Health of the Republic of Moldova, State Medical and Pharmaceutical University Nicolae Testemitanu, Medical Students and Residents Association |
Citation: | FUŞTEI, Eugenia, FUŞTEI, Roman, GÎNJU, Nadia, CIGOREANU, Elena. Variability of the extracranian branches of the facial nerve (Morphoclinical aspects). In: MedEspera: the 5th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2014, p. 35-36. |
Abstract: | Introduction: Numerical and trajectory variability of facial nerve branches is one of the main
causes of failed surgery, which determine neurologists and surgeons to perform systematic studies
o f variants of branching path and extracranial portion of the facial nerve.
Purpose and Objectives: To study the variability of the extracranial facial nerve branches
and create morphological path way maps of facial nerve.
Material and methods: The variants of branching of the extracranial part of the facial nerve
were studied in 12 anatomical parts.
Results: The facial nerve variants branching of two primary trunks and cervicofacial
temporofacial was predominant in 10 cases out of 12 studied cases, nerve trifurcation was observed
only in one case, as evidenced by the case of the nerve branch fan-shaped. The length of the
predominant average criteria was in eight cases, followed by three short length and long-term cases
in a single case. In five cases the nerve trunk had an upward trajectory, in four cases the trajectory
was downward and in three cases there was a horizontal trajectory. In eight cases predominate thick
upper torso (temporofacial), in three cases by thick trunks were equal and only in one case the thickness of the lower torso prevailed over the upper torso. The anatomical parts were made on
cadaveric material belonging to the same person, in one case we noticed the obvious difference in
how right branching nerve is located on the left side of the face, and in the second case differences
were not very pronounced. The results show that the distance between the primary trunks between
10 and 70°, the extent of the upper torso (temporofacial) is between 30 and 130°, the extent of the
lower torso is between 25 and 70°, the angles of the branches of the upper torso are between 10° and
70°, lower torso angles between branches vary between 20 and 40°.
Conclusions: (1) The variability of the extracranial portion of the facial nerve branches falls
into a wide range of options. (2) Predominant after branching options -fork in primary trunks and
cervicofacial temporofacial after long-stem of medium length, as thick - temporofacial trunk are
after Ferry - upward. (3) According to surgical anatomical maps, distances between primary trunks
between 10 and 70°, the extent of the upper torso ( temporofacial ) is between 30 and 130°, the
extent of the lower torso is between 25 and 70°, the angles of the branches of the upper torso are
between 10° and 70°, the angles of the lower trunk branches vary between 20 and 40°. |
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: | MedEspera: The 5th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 14-17, 2014, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova |
URI: | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/18432 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2014
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|