|
- IRMS - Nicolae Testemitanu SUMPh
- 1. COLECȚIA INSTITUȚIONALĂ
- MedEspera: International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors
- MedEspera 2012
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12710/19839
Title: | Extracorporeal schok wave lithotripsy (ESWL) - experience of the Departament of Urology Republican Clinical Hospital |
Authors: | Bradu, A. |
Keywords: | extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy;experience;patients |
Issue Date: | 2012 |
Publisher: | State Medical and Pharmaceutical University Nicolae Testemitanu, Medical Students and Residents Association, Scientific Association of Students and Young Doctors |
Citation: | BRADU, A. Extracorporeal schok wave lithotripsy (ESWL) - experience of the Departament of Urology Republican Clinical Hospital. In: MedEspera: the 4th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2012, pp. 137-138. |
Abstract: | Introduction: In present days, in Republic of Moldova, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)
is a usual form of treatment for renoureteral lithiasis. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the results
after treatment of urolithiasis with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in our clinic.
Material and Methods: During August 2011 - December 2011, a number of 190 patients were treated
by ESWL for renoureteral lithiasis and a number of 243 treatment procedures were performed. The device we have is a second generation MODULITH" SLK lithotripter, with radiological and ultrasonographic localization system. In a number of 115 patients the localization of calculi was renal (60,52%), in
75 cases (39,47%) was ureteral localization.
Results: In a number of 120 patients (63,15%) ESWL was the single method used for therapy. A number of associated methods of treatment (percutaneous nephrostomy, ureteral catheter,) was necessary for
25 patients (13,15%). ESWL was made in 10 patients with a single kidney (5,26%). 40 (21,05%) patients
were necessary two treatments, with in 3 (1,57%) patients three treatments or more were used. Severe
complications occurred in 11 % cases (sepsis, anuria, perirenal hematoma, steinstrasse, etc.)
Conclusions:
1. ESWL is a very common method of treatment of renoureteral lithiasis and indication of primary
treatement is about 70%.
2. Associated methods (percutaneous nephrostomy, autostatic ureteral catheter, etc) were necessary before or after the procedure in case of non fragmentation or complications.
3. Severe complications lead to a adequate therapy (internal or external drainage of urinary system in
urosepsis), and in the perirenal hematoma in evolution - open surgery. |
metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: | MedEspera: The 4th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 17-19, 2012, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova |
URI: | http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/19839 |
Appears in Collections: | MedEspera 2012
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|