Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

What can and what cannot be accomplished with PET: clarifying ongoing misconceptions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Abass, Alavi
dc.date.accessioned 2020-05-28T19:34:30Z
dc.date.available 2020-05-28T19:34:30Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation ABASS, Alavi. What can and what cannot be accomplished with PET: clarifying ongoing misconceptions. In: The Moldovan Medical Journal. 2018, vol. 61, RMI Congress Issue, p. 41. ISSN 2537-6381.
dc.identifier.issn 2537-6373
dc.identifier.issn 2537-6381
dc.identifier.uri http://moldmedjournal.md/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/The-Moldovan-Medical-Journal-vol-61-mai.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/10012
dc.description Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA, The IVth Congress of Radiology and Medical Imaging of the Republic of Moldova with international participation, Chisinau, May 31 – June 2, 2018 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: The introduction of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) in 1976 as a joint effort of the University of Pennsylvania and Brookhaven National Laboratory opened new perspectives in medical imaging. Although FDG PET/CT has become a unique cornerstone of molecular imaging and one of the most widely used imaging modalities, familiarity with its limitations is of paramount importance for avoiding unnecessary examinations. Content: FDG PET and PET/CT are now widely used in many oncologic diseases for tumor staging/re-staging and monitoring of disease activity as well as for evaluating the response to administered therapy. However, FDG is a nonspecific tracer and can also accumulate at the sites of many benign processes. Even though dual time-point imaging of FDG PET may be helpful in differentiating malignant from benign processes, exceptions exist, and some authors have even demonstrated significant overlap of FDG uptake patterns in malignant and benign lesions. A variety of other PET radiopharmaceuticals such as FLT, 60Cu-ATSM, 18F-EF5, 18F-FMISO, FIAU, FHBG, FHPG, 11C-Acetate, 18F-Fuoride, 94mTc-MIBI, 18F or 11C -labeled Choline are increasingly being used in various disorders and their area of clinical applications is expanding. In this context, the lecture is also approaching various controversial domains such as PET applications for imaging islets in pancreas, detecting plaques and tangles in Alzheimer’s disease or bacteria at sites of infection. Last, but not least, the presentation provides a brief summary related to novel quantitative techniques such as partial volume correction and global disease assessment. Conclusion: At the end of the lecture attendees would expand their knowledge about what can and what cannot be accomplished with FDG PET/CT imaging. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher The Scientific Medical Association of the Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.relation.ispartof The Moldovan Medical Journal: The IVth Congress of Radiology and Medical Imaging of the Republic of Moldova with international participation, Chisinau, May 31 – June 2, 2018
dc.subject Positron emission tomography en_US
dc.subject Fluorodeoxyglucose en_US
dc.subject FDG PET/CT limitations en_US
dc.subject.mesh Positron-emission tomography - methods en_US
dc.subject.mesh Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 en_US
dc.subject.mesh Positron emission tomography computed tomography - methods en_US
dc.title What can and what cannot be accomplished with PET: clarifying ongoing misconceptions en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics