dc.contributor.author |
Cunningham, Anthony J. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-06-17T08:43:37Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-06-17T08:43:37Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
CUNNINGHAM, Anthony J. Intra-abdominal Sepsis – epidemiology and clinical presentation. In: Arta Medica. 2009, nr. 3(36), supl. Congresul II Internaţional al SARRM, pp.18-19. ISSN 1810-1852. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
1810-1852 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/10436 |
|
dc.description |
Dublin, Ireland, Congresul II Internaţional al Societăţii Anesteziologie Reanimatologie din Republica Moldova 27-30 august 2009 |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Severe Sepsis (acute organ dysfunction secondary to infection) and septic shock (severe sepsis plus hypotension not reversed
with fluid resuscitation) are major healthcare problems, affecting millions of individuals around the world each year, killing one
in four (and often more), and increasing in incidence [1].
Incidence increased from 82 to 240/100,000 population
Men > women 1.28 CI
Reduced mortality rate 27 to 18%
Highest mortality black men
Decreased length of hospital stay
Increased discharge to chronic care
Predominance gram positive organism after 1987
Fungal organism increase 207 %
Similar to major trauma, acute myocardial infarction or stroke, the speed and appropriateness of therapy administered in the
initial hours after severe sepsis develops are likely to influence outcome. In 2004, an international group of experts in the diagnosis
and management of infection and sepsis, representing 11 organizations, published the first internationally accepted guidelines that
the bedside clinician could use to improve outcomes in severe sepsis and septic shock [2]. These guidelines represented phase II of
the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) an international effort to increase awareness and improve outcomes in severe sepsis. Joined
by additional organizations the group met again in 2006 and 2007 to update the guidelines document using a new evidence-based
methodology system for assessing quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [3]. |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Asociaţia chirurgilor “Nicolae Anestiadi” din Republica Moldova |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Sepsis--diagnosis |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Sepsis--classification |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Sepsis--epidemiology |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Abdominal Pain--diagnosis |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Abdominal Pain--physiopathology |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Abdominal Pain--etiology |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Sepsis--prevention & control |
en_US |
dc.title |
Intra-abdominal Sepsis – epidemiology and clinical presentation |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |