Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Implant supported restoration in single-tooth replacement

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cheptanaru, Olga
dc.date.accessioned 2019-04-09T12:30:40Z
dc.date.available 2019-04-09T12:30:40Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation CHEPTANARU, Olga, GODOROJA, Pavel. Implant supported restoration in single-tooth replacement. In: The Moldovan Medical Journal. 2018, vol. 61, no 1, pp. 55-62. ISSN 2537-6373. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2537-6373
dc.identifier.issn 2537-6381
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/1174
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1186202
dc.identifier.uri http://moldmedjournal.md/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/moldmedjournal-2018-61-1-full-issue.pdf
dc.description Pavel Godoroja Department of Dental Propaedeutics, Nicolae Testemitsanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, the Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: The implant-prosthetic restoration in single missing tooth is a viable treatment option for the functional rehabilitation of tooth loss. Several published studies show that the deadline and the type of functional loading of the implant for single missing teeth is not decisive for the survival and success rate of the implant. Although the conventional protocol is still the “gold standard”, the immediate loading of dental implants in the fresh postextraction socket of the aesthetic area has an excellent prognosis. Immediate functional loading is successfully adopted to minimize the treatment time with immediate and impact benefit on the patient’s quality of life and satisfaction. The aesthetic result is not yet systematically included in the success criteria of the therapy through implant, although a trend for this is more common in recent publications, particularly in publications evaluating the implant prosthetic rehabilitation in the anterior maxilla and mandible. In order to obtain optimal aesthetic results, it is necessary to take into account the other aesthetic parameters, together with the chosen material for the fabrication of the implant-supported single crown and the type of prosthetic abutment. Conclusions: The systematic review of the contemporary specialty literature examines the types of implantations and implant-supported restorations for single tooth replacement, the survival rates of the implant, the survival of the crown on the implant and the successful implant, incidence of biological, technical and aesthetical complications of the implants and prosthetic restorations on implants, the quality of life related to the oral health to patients with implant-prosthetic treatment. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher The Scientific Medical Association of the Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.relation.ispartof The Moldovan Medical Journal
dc.subject single missing tooth en_US
dc.subject implant-prosthetic restoration en_US
dc.subject success rate en_US
dc.subject aesthetic result en_US
dc.subject complications en_US
dc.subject.ddc UDC: 616.314-089.843
dc.subject.mesh Dental Implants en_US
dc.subject.mesh Dental Implants, Single-Tooth--adverse effects en_US
dc.subject.mesh Dental Prosthesis--methods en_US
dc.subject.mesh Dental Restoration, Permanent--methods en_US
dc.subject.mesh Denture, Partial, Fixed en_US
dc.subject.mesh Esthetics, Dental en_US
dc.subject.mesh Quality of Life en_US
dc.title Implant supported restoration in single-tooth replacement en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics