Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Șerban, Al. O.
dc.contributor.author Obadă, B.
dc.contributor.author Borgazi, E.
dc.contributor.author Zekra, M.
dc.contributor.author Botnaru, V.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-31T17:10:20Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-31T17:10:20Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation ȘERBAN, Al. O., OBADĂ, B., BORGAZI, E. et al. Difficulties in classification of malleolar fractures. In: Arta Medica. 2016, nr. 4(61), p. 20. ISSN 1810-1852. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1810-1852
dc.identifier.uri https://artamedica.md/old_issues/ArtaMedica_61.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12453
dc.description Clinic of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Emergency County Hospital Constanța, Romania, Al VIII-lea Congres Naţional de Ortopedie și Traumatologie cu participare internaţională 12-14 octombrie 2016 en_US
dc.description.abstract Objective Classification of malleolar fractures are a matter of debate. The Lauge Hansen and the AO-classification are defined as complicated, where the Weber-classification is too simplistic. In trimalleolar fracture is the role and the size of the posterior fragment an additional complicating factor. Material. Methods. Interobserver study: four observers (2 traumasurgeons, 2 radiologists) classified 100 X-rays to the AO-, the Lauge-Hansenand the Danis-Weber classification. In case of a trimalleolar fracture they were asked to measure the size of the posterior fragment. Results Within the Weber classification, there is a lot of discussion whether the fracture is a proximal “Weber B” or a distal “Weber C”. This problem also exists in the AO-classification. In addition, it is not possible to classify the isolated medial malleolus fracture. The biggest problem of the Lauge-Hansen classification is that anamnestic (and in particular radiological) the trauma-mechanism remains unclear. As a result, it is possible to classify identically fractures in different groups. Small posterior avulsion fragments prove difficult to determine on the initial X-ray. Overshadowing of the fibula is the avultion of a very small fragment shows to be limiting factor. Fixation if posterior fragments is, in most literature, dependent on the size if the posterior fragments. Some authors advocate that not only size but most important, the congrunecy of tibiotalar articular surface should be leading in choice of treatment for anatomic restoration. In that case, assessment of size if the posterior fragment is less important where the detection of smaller dislocated posterior fragment is of much more value. Conclusions The ankle X-ray is in most cases a useful tool in detecting clinical relevant fractures of the posterior malleolus however preoperative CT evaluation might be a very useful addition both in pre-operative planning and detection from smaller dislocated posterior fragments. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Asociaţia chirurgilor “Nicolae Anestiadi” din Republica Moldova en_US
dc.subject malleolar fracture en_US
dc.subject classification en_US
dc.subject ankle en_US
dc.title Difficulties in classification of malleolar fractures en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics