Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Allografting of acetabular defects as an alternative method in hip revision arthroplasties

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ciobanu, Sergiu
dc.contributor.author Vetrilă, Viorel
dc.contributor.author Beţişor, Alexandru
dc.contributor.author Vladov, Sergiu
dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-09T17:58:43Z
dc.date.available 2020-11-09T17:58:43Z
dc.date.issued 2020-10
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12740
dc.identifier.uri https://stiinta.usmf.md/ro/manifestari-stiintifice/zilele-universitatii
dc.description „Nicolae Testemitanu" State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Chisinau Republic of Moldova, Medpark International Hospital, Chisinau Republic of Moldova, Clinical hospital of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Chisinau Republic of Moldova, Congresul consacrat aniversării a 75-a de la fondarea Universității de Stat de Medicină și Farmacie „Nicolae Testemițanu” din Republica Moldova, Ziua internațională a științei pentru pace și dezvoltare en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction. Meta-analysis of studies shows that approximately 1/3 of patients with instability of acetabular components after primary hip arthroplasty have huge acetabular defects. The prevalence of hip revision arthroplasty is 7-18%. Purpose. To determine the possibilities and effectiveness of restoring acetabular bone defects using allogeneic bone material in hip revision arthroplasty Material and methods. A descriptive study was performed in the period 2017-2020 on a group of 72 patients (79 hips) admitted to Department no. 8 within the Clinical hospital of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova. Patients underwent radiolographic examination and computed tomography. Results. Acetabular defects were distributed according to the W. G. Paprosky classification (fig. 1). Depending on the degree of defect, the patients were distributed as follows: type 1 - 15 (18,9%), type 2 - 41 (51.8%) and type 3 - 23 (29,1%). It should be noted that according to the Paprosky classification, good results were obtained in the treatment with allografts in all the types, notwithstanding the more advanced defects in the type 2 and 3. Conclusions. Our patients showed good allogenic bone ingrowth in relation to the acetabular bed and good bone restructuring and incorporation in relation to the implant. Neither mechanical failure of implants nor graft rejection were recorded These results suggest that despite the degree of acetabular bone deficit, we can obtain good results, even in type 3, having at hand the technical possibility of bone plasty and the revision implant. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie "Nicolae Testemiţanu" en_US
dc.subject revision arthroplasties en_US
dc.subject bone allograft en_US
dc.subject acetabular defect en_US
dc.title Allografting of acetabular defects as an alternative method in hip revision arthroplasties en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics