Abstract:
Introduction
In the US the AP has a prevalence of 3.3%, for
men – 3.4%, and for women – 3.2%. In the European
countries, according to the data of European Society
of Cardiology (ESC), the prevalence of AP raises increases with age for both sexes: from 4-7% for men
aged between 45 and 64, and from 5-7% from the
women of the same age, from 12-14% for the men
aged between 65 and 84 and 10-12% for women of
the same age [1, 2].
The most common AP complication is the acute
myocardial infarction (AMI). In the United States
the prevalence of the myocardial infarction among
adults aged ≥20 is 2.8%, 4.0% for men and 1.8 for
women. The scientists, who studied this field, have
calculated that every 43 seconds an American citizen may develop AMI [1]. According to population
studies of Olmsted County and Framingham, the
patients with AP develop AMI in 3.-3.5 % per year,
so in 30 patients with AP, the AMI progresses in one
person [2, 5].
In the United States, IHD causes 146.5 deaths
per 100000 of population among men and 80.1 per
100000 of population among women. IHD is responsible for 25.3% of deaths [4, 5]. In Europe, IHD is
responsible for 1.8 million of deaths per year, which
corresponds to 20% of men and 21% of women. In
the Republic of Moldova the death rate because of
IHD per 100.000 of population is 138 per men and
51 per women, simultaneously, Romania presents
a death rate approximately 2 times smaller: 75 per
100.000 of population – men and 21 per 100.000 –
women, and the highest death rate because of IHD
is in Russia: 186 per 100.000 of population – men and
44 per 100.000 of population – at women [6].
Various observational studies have proved the
existence of sex differences both in clinical and paraclinical presentation, and in therapeutic options
which are not effective and safe in equal measures
for men and women. At the same time, it has been
proved that the men are involved to a lesser extent
in the population studies pointing the cardiovascular diseases, so from 62 randomized studies in
Europe only 33.5% of participants were women [3,
5]. It was found that men with AP who seek medical
attention have a superficial approach, involving
more frequently the noninvasive methods versus the
invasive methods, and they have a lesser possibility
than men of revascularization treatment. So, among
the men with AP, 4.2% of them dispose of revascularization, meanwhile only in 2.4% of women with AP
dispose of this option of treatment [2, 5].
Taking into consideration the growing of the
incidence of AP in women, the determination of
a late diagnosis because of clinical atypical manifestations and the reduced involvement of women
with AP in population studies, we intend to study
the AP peculiarities of women from the Republic of
Moldova, which means an actual health and social
problem.
The aim of the study: to study the etiological,
clinical and paraclinical peculiarities and the treatment of stable angina in men.
Objectives of the study. To study the cardiac
predisposing factors and comorbidities in men with
stable angina. To analyze the peculiarities of clinical
evolution of stable angina in men. To evaluate the
paraclinical results in patients that was included in
the study. To evaluate the treatment of stable angina
in men.
The study included 116 patients with AP, admitted to the Municipal Hospital Sfanta Treime and
the Cardiological Institute during September 2015
– November 2016. Diagnostic of Stable Angina was
determined by clinical criteria: anamnesis, clinical
manifestations, objective data; instrumental examination: electrocardiography in all patients, effort
test and coronary angiography in patients selected
for revascularization by coronary artery bypass grafting, Holter monitor ECG, stress test medication in a
group of patients for technical reasons; Laboratory
tests: lipidogram, coagulation, blood glucose, blood
counts in all patients, and markers of myocyte injury
in some patients with UAP for financial reasons.
Results and discussions
According to the study goals and objectives,
we analyzed in detail AP patients with predisposing
factors to determine, comorbidities, clinical manifestations and complications, results paraclince
specific treatment and preventive measures in these
patients. Starting from the paper’s purpose patients
were divided into 2 groups according to sex. In our
study group were predominantly men, numbering
67, which constituted 57,8%, compared to women
– 49 which corresponds to 42,2%. AP increased prevalence among men is explained by the fact that
women have a protective role of ovarian hormones
in premenopausal period. We aimed to evaluate patients in the study depending on age and sex, the
data is illustrated in the following graphic.
In patients aged up to 64 years, AP predominates in men than women: ≤44 years (2,8% vs 0%),
45-54 years (16,5% vs 9,2%); 55-64 years old (46,5%
vs 29,4%) and after age 65, AP prevalence is higher
in women compared to men: 65-74 years old (32%
vs 22,8%); 75-84 years old (26,8% vs 11%); ≥85 years
(2,6% vs 0,4%). This phenomenon can be explained
by the combination of a new risk factor in women
and certain post-menopausal and longer life expectancy of women than men [1, 4].
Analyzing the results, we note that the initial
diagnosis of AP was established more frequently in
men (62.6%) compared to women (51.6%). Acute
Coronary Syndrome was suspected equally to men
(22.4%) and women (23.72%). At the same time, women were hospitalized more frequently with other
diagnoses (24.2%) vs men (12.2%).
According to the pain location, we can observe
that in men typical retrosternal pain and precordial
pain is determined 82,4% vs 88,5% in biggest proportion compared to women‘s. At the same time, for
women’s prevailed pain in the atypical locations in
5.2% and missing of the pain in 12.4%. This results
is explaining by a big prevalence of atypical clinical
picture of AP.
Analyzing this obtained results, we can observe, that men’s pain radiates predominantly on a left
shoulder – 67.2 % vs 48.4 %, during the time that
extension of the pain in other regions is present
more frequently for women’s. In the left shoulder and
hand – 17.8% vs 9.8%, interscapulo – vertebral 17.8%
vs 14.8%, throat – 8% vs 6.6%, mandible – 3.2% and
other locations – 4.8% vs 1.6%. Studying the data
obtained, we note that in most of the patients, the
AP gives the administration of nitroglycerin, a rate
less prevalent in men (59.1%) than in women (62.3%).
Anginal pain at rest was determined that yield more
often in men (21.5%) than in women (17.1%), and
improving crisis management nitroglycerin angina
both at rest and was in an amount almost equal to
both sexes 19.4% vs 20.6%. Various observational
studies have proved the existence of sex differences
both in clinical and paraclinical presentation, and in
therapeutic options which are not effective and safe
in equal measures for men and women. At the same
time, it has been proved that the men are involved
to a lesser extent in the population studies pointing
the cardiovascular diseases, so from 62 randomized
studies in Europe only 33.5% of participants were
women [Stramba-Badiale M., 2009]. It was found
that men with AP who seek medical attention have
a superficial approach, involving more frequently
the noninvasive methods versus the invasive methods, and they have a lesser possibility than men
of revascularization treatment. So, among the men
with AP, 4.2% of them dispose of revascularization,
meanwhile only in 2.4% of women with AP dispose
of this option of treatment. In the study group gr
II IC prevailed in almost equal proportion in both
sexes, women (57.8%) vs men (59.1%), followed by
IC gr. III (36.2%) vs. (35.6%). Gr. IV IC and IC gr. I was
in the minority.
We should notice that the anti-ischemic therapy, most commonly administered beta-AB, slightly
more prevalent in men (73.2%) vs (68.6%), BCC, commonly administered to women (56.2%) vs ( 44.5%)
and less nitrates: 14.9% for women vs 12.2% men.
The cytoprotective benefited equally to men (41.3%)
and women (39.2%). For prophylactic antiplatelet
prevailed slightly more prevalent in men (71.2%)
vs women (70.3%). Statins and anticoagulants were
given less frequently in women.
Conclusions
Angina pectoris is higher in men than in women
(57,8% vs 42,2%). The rate of pathology is changing
with age, up to 64 years, angina is more frequent is
meat in men (65,8%) vs 38,6 in women, and after the
age of 65 years, women prevail (61,4% vs 34,2%).
In patients with angina clinical picture was more
often represented by the retrosternal pain in 52,7%
and dependent in physical exertion in 68,5% of
medium intensity, with a duration of 5-10 minutes
at those with stable angina (15,9%) and 20 minutes
from those with unstable angina (14,7%), that were
ameliorated after nitroglycerin intaking. Men representing the angina pectoris have administrated
the pharmacological treatment mostly with: notice
that the anti-ischemic therapy, most commonly administered beta-AB, slightly more prevalent in men
(73.2%) vs (68.6%), BCC, commonly administered to
women (56.2%) vs (44.5%) and less nitrates: 14.9%
for women vs 12.2% men.