Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

The importance of mucogingival flaps in guided bone regeneration in the jaws

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zugrav, Vasile
dc.contributor.author Chele, Dumitru
dc.contributor.author Chele, Nicolae
dc.contributor.author Cucu, Ghenadie
dc.date.accessioned 2025-03-13T11:41:40Z
dc.date.available 2025-03-13T11:41:40Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.citation ZUGRAV, Vasile; CHELE, Dumitru; CHELE, Nicolae; CUCU, Ghenadie. The importance of mucogingival flaps in guided bone regeneration in the jaws. In: Revista de Ştiinţe ale Sănătăţii din Moldova = Moldovan Journal of Health Sciences. 2024, vol. 11, nr. 4, pp. 30-37. ISSN 2345-1467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2024.4.05 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2345-1467
dc.identifier.uri https://mjhs.md/sites/default/files/2024-12/MJHS_11_4_2024.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/30073
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.52645/MJHS.2024.4.05
dc.description.abstract Introduction. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a surgical method that allows the formation of new bone in areas of atrophy of the maxillary bone. The integration of the graft or the augmented bone under the mucosal flap and the primary healing of the soft tissues are essential conditions for preventing the exposure of the regeneration site and infectious complications that inevitably lead to the failure of the GBR procedure. Materials and methods. This study presents the results of a cohort study that includes 70 patients who underwent GBR. The research involved techniques for forming muco-periosteal flaps: the Modified Periosteal Releasing Incision (MPRI) according to the principle of the double flap technique (DF) and the coronal advanced lingual flap (CALF). The study group included patients who underwent GBR using perforated titanium membrane, while the second group underwent GBR using bioresorbable poly-4 hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) synthetic mesh. The patients were evaluated periodically to monitor postoperative progress, the cases of dehiscence of the area related to augmentation site were recorded, measured and classified according to Fontana. Statistical results were generated and processed by the R Studio program. Results. In the study groups, a total of 8 cases of gingival dehiscence were registered, 4 cases in each group. In two cases, partial removal of the titanium membrane was performed by milling it, and the remaining 6 cases of dehiscence were remedied with rinses with oral antiseptic solution and scheduled visits for local care until the appearance of granulation tissue and epithelization. Conclusions. Protective membrane, flap formation, thread tension and suture relaxation all play crucial roles in guided bone augmentation without dehiscence. In our study, the small number of dehiscence cases recorded as complications did not provide significant statistical results, namely due to the technique of performing the flap according to contemporary methods, a fact also described by the specialized literature. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Instituţia Publică Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu” din Republica Moldova en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Revista de Ştiinţe ale Sănătăţii din Moldova = Moldovan Journal of Health Sciences en_US
dc.subject guided bone regeneration (GBR) en_US
dc.subject flap en_US
dc.subject.ddc UDC: 616.716.8-007.23-089.844+ 611.018 en_US
dc.title The importance of mucogingival flaps in guided bone regeneration in the jaws en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics