Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Anevrismul aortic abdominal, tratament, opţiuni şi rezultate

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cemirtan, R.
dc.contributor.author Bernaz, E.
dc.contributor.author Tabac, R.
dc.date.accessioned 2020-02-06T15:29:46Z
dc.date.available 2020-02-06T15:29:46Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.citation CEMIRTAN, R., BERNAZ, E., TABAC, R. Anevrismul aortic abdominal, tratament, opţiuni şi rezultate. In: Curierul Medical. 2014, vol. 57, no 4, pp. 95-100. ISSN 1875-0666. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1875-0666
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/7396
dc.identifier.uri http://moldmedjournal.md/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/81.pdf
dc.description Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Republican Teaching Hospital, Chisinau, the Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.description.abstract Background: The Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) represents 12 causes of mortality in elderly subjects in the USA. Small aneurysms are symptomless, clinical signs can manifest in a large diameter. The natural evolution of the AAA lead to the rupture, the death rate in an acute rupture varies between 62-94%. Nonetheless, the surgical risk of the procedure can be assumed in the exceeding 5.0-5.5 diameter AAA. Generally, 2 options of surgery can be regarded. Open and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. This study is focused on the meta-analysis of the methods from different published studies, contrasting the aneurysm repair results in mid and long terms. Conclusions: The screening of the risk group reduces the mortality by AAA. The ultrasound monitoring is recommended for a diameter between 3.0 and 5.0 cm and an interventional treatment is indicated for the aneurysms larger than 5.0 cm in men and 4.5 cm in women. The perioperative mortality can be reduced by the introduction of the drug therapy in scheduled surgery of AAA and by controlled hypotension with limited volume perfusion in ruptured AAA. The death rate in scheduled endovascular treatment is under 2%, whereas in open version can arise up to 6-7%. The long follow-up shows similar results for both methods. According to the current studies, the application of endovascular technology has no benefit in long-term follow-up. en_US
dc.language.iso ro en_US
dc.publisher The Scientific Medical Association of the Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Curierul Medical
dc.subject abdominal aortic aneurysm en_US
dc.subject endoleak en_US
dc.subject.mesh Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal--diagnosis en_US
dc.subject.mesh Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal--surgery en_US
dc.subject.mesh Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal--diagnostic imaging en_US
dc.subject.mesh Ultrasonography en_US
dc.subject.mesh Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal--therapy en_US
dc.subject.mesh Endovascular Procedures--methods en_US
dc.title Anevrismul aortic abdominal, tratament, opţiuni şi rezultate en_US
dc.title.alternative Abdominal aortic aneurysm, treatment, options and results en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics