dc.contributor.author |
Arnaut, Oleg |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Croitoru, Dan |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Grabovschi, Ion |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sandru, Serghei |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-05-26T06:50:35Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-05-26T06:50:35Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
ARNAUT, Oleg, CROITORU, Dan, GRABOVSCHI, Ion,
SANDRU, Serghei. Trauma scoring systems. In: The Moldovan
Medical Journal. 2020, vol. 63, no 1, pp. 64-74. ISSN 2537-6373.
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3685673. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
2537-6373 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2537-6381 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/9835 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://moldmedjournal.md/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Mold-Med-J-March-2020-Vol-63-No-1-Full-Issue-version-5-of-10-06-20.pdf |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3685673 |
|
dc.description |
Department of Human Physiology and Biophysics, Valeriu Ghereg Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nicolae Testemițanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, the Republic of Moldova |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Background: Worldwide, traumas represent an actual theme of discussion. The recognition and interpretation of severe traumas are essential for choosing
the right treatment strategy. There are two approaches to mark the patients with a high risk of unfavorable evolution and death. First, to use the terms
as “major trauma”, “severe trauma” and “polytrauma”, without ability to stratify the patients according the severity of lesions inside categories mentioned
above. Second, to implement the trauma scoring systems (anatomical, physiological or mixed), when a doctor uses a mathematical algorithm/model to
calculate the risks for each trauma patient. At the same time, according to the articles found on PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases,
there is no international consensus concerning the most accurate traumatic score. This article’s goal was to revise the existing trauma scoring systems to
highlight the potential scoring systems that in perspective can be validated in the Moldovan medical system.
Conclusions: Different traumatic scores are used worldwide (different continents, countries or regions) to estimate the severity of trauma patients in
relation to the anatomical, physiological or combined criteria. All of them could be potentially validated for the Moldovan medical system. A part of
these scores could be validated and compared to identify those ones that have the best determination, calibration and discrimination abilities to predict
the outcomes for the local medical system. As a result, the coefficients from the mathematical equations belonging to the scores could be adjusted to the
conditions of the national medical system of the Republic of Moldova. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
The Scientific Medical Association of the Republic of Moldova |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof |
The Moldovan Medical Journal |
|
dc.subject |
trauma scoring systems |
en_US |
dc.subject |
severe trauma |
en_US |
dc.subject.ddc |
UDC: 616-001-07:614.2(478) |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Wounds and Injuries--diagnosis |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Wounds and Injuries--physiopathology |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Wounds and Injuries--therapy |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Patient Acuity |
en_US |
dc.subject.mesh |
Severity of Illness Index |
en_US |
dc.title |
Trauma scoring systems |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |