Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Clinical tools in diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis in primary care

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Popescu, Elena
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-06T08:39:48Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-06T08:39:48Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation POPESCU, Elena. Clinical tools in diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis in primary care. In: MedEspera: the 6th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2016, p. 61. en_US
dc.identifier.uri
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/10988
dc.description Family medicine, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, The 6th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2016 en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction: The knee osteoarthritis (OA), the most common chronic illness, has the potential to compromise the health and quality of life of not only in the patient but also affect family members and is challenging through the need to develop tools for diagnosis. The aim was to assess the applicability of osteoarthritis index WOMAC and 30s Chair Stand Test (30s-CST) in patients with knee osteoarthritis in primary care. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was performed according to the disease severity based on functional limitation in the absence of joint prosthesis. There were recruited patients from primary care that fulfilled the ACR classification criteria for knee OA (1991). All subjects completed the Osteoarthritis index WOMAC (Western Ontario McMaster Universities Questionnaire), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and performed 30s-CST. Discussion results: In the study were included 36 patients and 30 (83.3%) of which were females. The mean age of the study group (M ± SD) was 58.6±10.3 (range 37 to 65) years and disease duration (M±SD) 5.6±4.0 (range 1-21) years. The pain was present in 94.4% cases; the level of knee pain assessed by VAS (M±SD) was 66.9 ±21.2mm. The WOMAC index, showed a better result on the stiffness scale (1.43±2.46) and the worsted on physical function (M±SD) 33.2±2.54 points. The result from 30s-CST test in the group was 11.4±0.45s. The result of CST didn’t correlate with pain intensity (r = -0.09); meanwhile, we found a strong correlation with physical function (r = 0.7). WOMAC index values from group were moderate influenced by radiographic severity (r = 0.5). The duration of the medical consultation with utilization of these tools was (M±SD) 20.2±3.4 minutes. Conclusion: The results of the test 30s-CST and WOMAC index correlated insignificantly with the severity of radiographic changes. Meantime, we observed trend of increase for test’s screening power along with disease progression. The application of additional tools increases the duration of medical consultation, an option could be implemented some of them in triage room. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MedEspera en_US
dc.subject knee osteoarthritis en_US
dc.subject diagnosis en_US
dc.subject primary care en_US
dc.title Clinical tools in diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis in primary care en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • MedEspera 2016
    The 6th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2016

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics