dc.description.abstract |
Objectives: To establish the relationship between cutaneous incolvment and Quality of Life
(QoL) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus
Methods: Cross-sectional study of SLE patients with cutaneous incolvment, fulfilling
SLICC/ACR 2012 classification criteria. Cutaneous involvement was assessed by Cutaneous Lupus
Erithematosus Diasease Area and Severity Index (CLASI), disease activity – by SLEDAI and SLAM
and QoL by SF-8 questionnaire. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between the
variables.
Results: The study included 102 caucasian SLE female patients with a mean age of 42,4±13,3
yrs and a mean disease duration of 93,9±77,1 months. The mean age at the disease onset was 35,5±14,8
yrs and the mean SLICC/ACR criteria number - 6,1±2,8 points. The disease activity by SLEDAI and
SLAM was appreciated as high with 1,24±10,4 and 12,1±8,6 points, respectively. The SLICC/ACR DI
constituted 1,47±1,6 points. The cutaneous involvment by CLASI showed a mean activity of 4,7 points
and a damage of 3,0 points, mean CLASI score being appreciated with 7,2 points. The QoL by SF-8
demonstrated low indices, compared to general population, in both domains: Physical Component
Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) with a mean value of 37,74 and 38,72 points,
respectively. The analysis of Pearson coefficient between the QoL and CLASI did not show significant
correlation (r=<0,2, p>0,05). The PCS og the QoL correlated inversely with the disease activity (r=-0,58
for SLAM and r=-0,45 for SLEDAI, p<0,05) and the MCS correlated inversely with SLICC/ACR
classificatino criteria (r=-0,45, p<0,05). CLASI activity index correlated with SLAM and SLEDAI
(r=0,45 for SLAM and r=0,37 for SLEDAI).
Conclusion: The QoL is dicreased in SLE patients by both components: physical and mental.
The severity of cutaneous involvment did not correlate with the QoL’s indices. Meantime, CLASI
activity score correlated with disease activity and the MCP pf the QoL correlated with the number of
SCLICC/ACR 2012 classification criteria. |
en_US |