Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Contour bone augmentation in implant-prosthetic rehabilitation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nour, Adrian
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-08T06:16:11Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-08T06:16:11Z
dc.date.issued 2018
dc.identifier.citation NOUR, Adrian. Contour bone augmentation in implant-prosthetic rehabilitation. In: MedEspera: the 7th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2018, p. 215-216. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/Abastract-Book-2018.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11127
dc.description Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Surgery and Oral Implantology Arsenie Gutan, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy of the Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction. In cases of moderate lateral atrophy of the crest bone splitting, sausage technique or other grafting procedures like bone blocks are recommended. However, in case of ridge expanding, subcrestal positioning of implants is necessary while in case of bone blocks the terms of rehabilitation are longer. Aim of the study. To evaluate the possibility of contour buccal grafting with simultaneous implants placement in one and two surgical steps. Materials and methods. The study was performed on 5 patients in which 10 implants were installed in one and two surgical steps in the lateral sides of the jaws. Due to horizontal bone atrophy, grafting procedures were performed with simultaneous implants placement. In one case, collagen membrane was used to isolate the grafting material and non submerged technique was applied for implant. In the others, implants were installed in one and two surgical steps with grafting material (collagen and hidroxyapatite) without collagen membranes. At the end of healing, for the implants installed in two-steps, the second stage was performed and the evaluation of the grafted volume was appreciated. In cases with one step protocol, the level of buccal soft tissues was appreciated. Results. All implants successfully integrated. In one case, solitary graft particles were observed in the soft tissues. The augmented sites shrank insignificantly, and a good profile from buccal site was observed in all the cases. No significant effect was observed in the usage of collagen membrane as well as in one or two-steps protocol. Conclusions. The usage of contour grafting in case of implants placement in posterior sides of the jaws seems to be a good method of augmentation. In case of a good periosteum, the collagen membrane isolation is not mandatory. Due to the lack of difference between one step and two steps protocol, the one step placement is more favorable because of the reduced number of surgeries and a mature biological width at the end of healing period. Further studies are necessary to appreciate indications and contraindications for such kind of augmentation. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MedEspera en_US
dc.subject implants en_US
dc.subject contour grafting en_US
dc.title Contour bone augmentation in implant-prosthetic rehabilitation en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • MedEspera 2018
    The 7th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 3-5, 2018

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics