Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Contemporary aspects of diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Brinzila, Sandu
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-09T05:31:00Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-09T05:31:00Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation BRINZILA, Sandu. Contemporary aspects of diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis. In: MedEspera: the 6th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2016, p. 127-128. en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-9975-3028-3-8.
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11161
dc.description Surgery Department II, Faculty of Medicine N1, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, The 6th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2016 en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Over the last decades the incidence of gallstones points out a major ascension. As a result we notice an increase of choledocholithiasis level, often being Associated with jaundice and angiocholitis. Optimal diagnosis and treatment evaluation, addressed to patients with choledocholithiasis on the basis and experience of Surgery Department No.2. Material and methods: 41 patients with choledocholithiasis were examined, who were treated in the hepato-biliary-pancreatic department of the Republican Clinical Hospital during 2014-2015 years. Diagnostic algorithm included several consecutive steps: I step - biochemical testing, sonographic examination; II stage - biliary tree direct contrast running the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ERCP. In cases of difficulty in diagnosis magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or computed tomography was made. Discussion results: ERCP was confirmed to be an optimal method both in topic diagnosis establishment and in decompression of biliary tree realization for a preoperative preparation. So in 30cases (73,17%) the full endoscopic extraction of stones with final recovery of patients was possible. In 4 cases (9,75%) the method allowed the CBP drainage over obstacle through a stenting with 7 Fr stent preparing patients for the second stage of the treatment of these 3 patients (7,31%) required choledochotomy with classical litextraction. And one patient (2,43%) had a megalocholedoch with multiple stones, but the situation was resolved by transection of choledoch with choledochojejunostomy on Roux loop. Postoperative complications were recorded in 3 patients being motivated by wound suppuration treated conservatively. Fatal outcomes in the study group were none. Conclusions: Minimally invasive endoscopic technologies allow final settlement of choledocholithiasis with stones up to 15 mm, but for exceeded cases there is a stage of decompression and drainage of cholangitis, a preparation for surgical interventions calmly. For an up to 20 mm choledoch in the absence of duodenostasis or distal strictures choledocholithotomia is done. Megalocholedoch is an indication for choledochojejunostomy on Roux loop. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MedEspera en_US
dc.subject Choledocholithiasis en_US
dc.subject ERCP en_US
dc.subject CRMN en_US
dc.subject stenting en_US
dc.subject holedochojejunostomy on Roux loup en_US
dc.title Contemporary aspects of diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • MedEspera 2016
    The 6th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2016

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics