Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Vaginal approach opposite (vs) to the abdominal in the surgical treatment of uterine myoma

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Medinschi, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-09T06:25:09Z
dc.date.available 2020-07-09T06:25:09Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.citation MEDINSCHI, Daniela. Vaginal approach opposite (vs) to the abdominal in the surgical treatment of uterine myoma. In: MedEspera: the 6th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2016, p. 140. en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-9975-3028-3-8.
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11183
dc.description Department of obstetrics and gynecology N2, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, The 6th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2016 en_US
dc.description.abstract Background. Hysterectomy is the second most common surgery performed on women of childbearing age. There are several ways to remove the uterus: abdominally, vaginally, through an incision at the back of the vagina, or laparoscopically. The goal of our study is to compare the complications in total hysterectomy depending on used surgical approach. Materials and methods. The retrospective study that constitutes the object of the present research was conducted on 1147 patients with uterine myoma and genital prolapse, admitted in the Clinic Municipal Hospital ‘’Saint Arhanghel Mihail’’of Chisinau over a period of 5 years (2010 – 2014). 142 of these patients (13% of cases) underwent total hysterectomy. Vaginal hysterectomy was performed at 82 patients and abdominal one at 60 patients. Results and discussion. In the result of this study the advantages of vaginal hysterectomy were recorded: reduced postoperative recovery time, fewer days of hospitalization, reduced hospital costs, reduced surgery time. Among the intraoperative observation, the mean duration of surgery of abdominal hysterectomy was 98.8 min and that of vaginal was 87 min (p=0.0192). Wound infection was the main cause for febrile morbidity in abdominal hysterectomy group where as urinary tract infection was the main cause for febrile morbidity in vaginal hysterectomy. There was one case of bladder injury and 1 case of ureteric injury in abdominal hysterectomy group while none in vaginal hysterectomy group. There was 6% of thromboembolic complications in abdominal hysterectomy and 1,5% in vaginal hysterectomy. There were 2 (4.0%) cases of postoperative hemorrhage in abdominal hysterectomy group and none in vaginal hysterectomy group.Conclusions. This study showed that vaginal hysterectomy was Associated with less intraoperative complications and postoperative morbidities and complications as compared to abdominal hysterectomy. Only a physician can determine the best approach to hysterectomy in an individual woman. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MedEspera en_US
dc.subject vaginal hysterectomy en_US
dc.subject abdominal hysterectomy en_US
dc.title Vaginal approach opposite (vs) to the abdominal in the surgical treatment of uterine myoma en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • MedEspera 2016
    The 6th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2016

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics