dc.contributor.author |
Golub, Elizaveta |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-10-05T17:48:54Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-10-05T17:48:54Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
GOLUB, Elizaveta. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in control of periodontal disease. In: MedEspera: the 6th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2016, pp. 303-304. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-9975-3028-3-8. |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11955 |
|
dc.description |
Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania, The 6th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2016 |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Introduction: Periodontitis is an inflammatory disease of the tissues that surround and support
the teeth, bringing about progressive destruction of periodontium. Periodontitis is caused by relatively
small group of microorganisms inhabiting the subgingival biofilm. The treatment of periodontal disease
aims to remove sub-gingival calculus (calculus) and biofilm deposits. Current treatment techniques
implies a recurrent mechanical destruction of oral bacteria or maintaining therapeutic concentrations of
antimicrobials in the oral cavity, both of which have their limits and do not give a lasting result. So that
we propose to provide an overview of alternative antibacterial therapeutic methodsas photodynamic
therapy (PDT), to ascertain the better strategies for control of microbial growth. Photodynamic therapy
is a treatment modality based on the activation of exogenous photosensitizing agents by a light source
to produce cell damage.
Objective: The presentation aims to study the effectiveness of antimicrobial photodynamic
therapy (PDT) as an adjunct to nonsurgical treatment of periodontal disease compared to the
conventional periodontitis treatment.
Methodology: We present the case of a 38 years old male patient, diagnosed with chronic
periodontitis. The patient was not a smoker and did not present any systemic inflammatory and/or
infectious diseases, nor was submitted to antibiotics or antiinflamatory drugs in the last 6 months. The
treatment procedure involved a split-mouth method (2 arches treated with conventional mechanical
periodontal therapy plus phodynamic disinfection and 2 arches treated only by conventional therapy).
The periodontal status (bleeding on probing, periodontal probing depth and plaque index) was re-assesed
at 2 weeks and 3 months post-therapy.
Results: Nearly all photodynamic activations caused a statistically significant improvement of
the periodontal status, with reduction in probing depth and bleeding on probing.
Conclusion: Within the limits of the present methodology, it can be concluded that antimicrobial
photodynamic therapy seems to be a reliable adjunctive therapeutic method of treatment the
periodontitis. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy may hold promise as a substitute for currently
available chemotherapy in the treatment of periodontal diseases. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
MedEspera |
en_US |
dc.subject |
antimicrobial photodynamic therapy |
en_US |
dc.subject |
photosensitizer |
en_US |
dc.subject |
periodontal pockets |
en_US |
dc.subject |
periodontitis |
en_US |
dc.title |
Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in control of periodontal disease |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |