Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

The role of microelectrode recording during Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus in patients with Parkinson’s disease

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Andrușca, Alexandru
dc.contributor.author Gavriliuc, Olga
dc.contributor.author Synowitz, Michael
dc.contributor.author Paschen, Steffen
dc.contributor.author Mehdorn, Maximilian H.
dc.contributor.author Falk, Daniela
dc.contributor.author Deuschl, Günther
dc.contributor.author Helmers, Ann-Kristin
dc.date.accessioned 2021-10-07T16:43:40Z
dc.date.available 2021-10-07T16:43:40Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation ANDRUSCA, Alexandru, GAVRILIUC, Olga, SYNOWITZ, Michael, PASCHEN, Steffen, MEHDORN, Maximilian H., et al. The role of microelectrode recording during Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus in patients with Parkinson’s disease. In: The Moldovan Medical Journal. 2021, vol. 64, no 3 (Neuro Congress Issue), p. 46. ISSN 2537-6381.
dc.identifier.issn 2537-6381
dc.identifier.issn 2537-6373
dc.identifier.uri http://moldmedjournal.md/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Congres-Neuro-2021-Spaltul-11.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/18117
dc.description.abstract Background: Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. However, the clinical outcome depends on the accurate location of the final electrode. Multiple microelectrode recording is believed to improve the precision, although it prolongs the duration of surgery. We hypothesize that patients implanted in the central trajectory have the same outcome as patients implanted decentrally. Material and methods: This study was carried out in UKSH Kiel and included 556 patients treated from 1999 until 2018 with bilateral STN-DBS (safety population). Pre- and postoperative efficacy data were available from 400 patients. The outcome parameter was the stimulation-induced improvement of the UPDRS for PD. We compared patients with both electrodes centrally to that bi-decentrally. The rate of surgical complications was determined with postoperative imaging. Results: A decentral tract was chosen in 41% of the electrodes (central, n = 471 electrodes; decentral, n = 329). Motor improvement was not different between patients with electrodes implanted bicentral (44.39% ± 22.71) or decentral (43.22% ± 17) trajectory bilaterally (p = 0.5571). Similar results were obtained for the hemi body score and subscores for akinesia, tremor, rigidity, postural instability and gait disorder. The overall bleeding rate was 2.78% and not dependent on the number of penetrations. Conclusions: Outcomes between the groups did not differ and, therefore, the use of mMER is likely to improve the outcome. Comparison with other cohorts does not disclose a higher rate of bleeding complications in this cohort with mMER. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher The Scientific Medical Association of the Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.relation.ispartof The Moldovan Medical Journal en_US
dc.subject STN en_US
dc.subject DBS en_US
dc.subject mMER en_US
dc.subject outcome en_US
dc.subject complications en_US
dc.title The role of microelectrode recording during Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus in patients with Parkinson’s disease en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics