Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus – a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Munteanu, Cristina
dc.date.accessioned 2021-10-15T19:31:20Z
dc.date.available 2021-10-15T19:31:20Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation MUNTEANU, Cristina. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus – a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In: The Moldovan Medical Journal. 2021, vol. 64, no 3 (Neuro Congress Issue), p. 58. ISSN 2537-6381.
dc.identifier.issn 2537-6381
dc.identifier.issn 2537-6373
dc.identifier.uri http://moldmedjournal.md/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Congres-Neuro-2021-Spaltul-11.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/18164
dc.description.abstract Background: Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is certainly an underdiagnosed pathology with chameleonic presentation. NCSE represents a persistent change in the level of consciousness, behavior, autonomic function, and sensorium associated with continuous epileptiform electroencephalographic (EEG) changes, but without major motor signs. NCSE comprises a group of syndromes with a wide range of response to anti-epileptics from self-limiting to refractory forms. It lacks prominent motor characteristic, but may have subtle motor signs (twitching, blinking). NCSE occurs in 8 – 37% of the ICU patients. The diagnosis and treatment are not straightforward and depend on clinical presentation, etiology, EEG findings. However, it is not always clear how electrographic activity contributes to clinical impairment or to ongoing neuronal injury. EEG criteria for NCSE are – definite electrographic seizure activity with typical evolution; periodical epileptiform discharges (EDs) or rhythmic discharge with clinical sign; rhythmic discharge with either clinical or electrographic response to treatment. More difficult is when there are EDs on EEG but they do not achieve the diagnostic criteria, we must look for: subtle motor signs time-related with EDs; spatio-temporal evolution; EEG and clinical improvement with anti-epileptics. Conclusions: Thus, NCSE diagnosis requires high index of suspicion in patients with risk factors and suggestive clinical features. Availability of continuous EEG is lacking in many centers and diagnosis is delayed. Early recognition and treatment are essential to optimize therapeutic response and to prevent neurological and systemic consequences. Overdiagnosis and aggressive treatment can contribute to high morbidity and mortality. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher The Scientific Medical Association of the Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.relation.ispartof The Moldovan Medical Journal en_US
dc.subject nonconvulsive status epilepticus en_US
dc.subject NCSE definition en_US
dc.subject NCSE diagnosis en_US
dc.subject EEG criteria en_US
dc.subject treatment en_US
dc.title Nonconvulsive status epilepticus – a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics