Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cernat, M.
dc.contributor.author Craciun, I.
dc.contributor.author Zastavnitchi, Gh.
dc.contributor.author Mishin, I.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-26T13:00:44Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-26T13:00:44Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation CERNAT, M., CRACIUN, I., ZASTAVNITCHI, Gh., MISHIN, I. Surgical treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia. In: MedEspera: the 4th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2012, pp. 184-185. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/19690
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is an abdominal catastrophe. Advanced age and diagnosis delay are associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates. The optimal surgical strategy for AMI is under evaluation. Aim: To evaluate the early results of different treatment strategies for AMI. Material and methods: During last three years a total of 35 consecutive pts with AMI were admitted to our unit. The mean (±SD) time interval between AMI symptoms onset and admission was 34.7±2.1 h. Physiological parameters (mean±SD) of pts were: ASA score - 3.3±0.1, APACHE score - 25.2±1.6 and POSSUM - 36.9±1.8. In most cases AMI was induced by superior mesenteric artery (SMA) embolism (54.3%, n = 19) followed by SMA thrombosis (25.7%, n= 9) and venous thrombosis (VT) (20%, n=7). Results: The affected bowel segments were: small intestine (n=16), small intestine + colon (n=13) and total ischemia (n=6). Surgical procedures were as follows: small intestine resection (n=14) with SMA embolectomy (n=2), small intestine + right colon (n=12) and small intestine + subtotal colectomy (n=l). In two cases of VT affected intestinal segments were not resected, instead anticoagulation treatment was initiated and the intestinal viability was confirmed by second-look laparotomy. Explorative laparotomy was used only in advanced intestinal gangrene (n=6). Twenty five pts with massive injury were scheduled for staged damage control approach (immediate resection of the involved bowel without gastrointestinal continuity reconstruction, patients’ resuscitation in ICU) combined with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (V.A.C., KCI or homemade) and later on definitive reconstructive procedure (delayed anastomosis). Primary anastomoses were performed only in 2 pts with short segmental intestinal infarction. The overall 30-days mortality rate was 24/35, 68.5% (in non-total AMI - 18/29, 62%, in VT zero). Conclusions: Early diagnosis and prompt surgery improves the AMI outcome. Colon involved in AMI is a poor prognosis sign. Damage control approach improves the AMI patients’ survival. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher State Medical and Pharmaceutical University Nicolae Testemitanu, Medical Students and Residents Association, Scientific Association of Students and Young Doctors en_US
dc.relation.ispartof MedEspera: The 4th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 17-19, 2012, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.subject acute mesenteric ischemia en_US
dc.subject surgery en_US
dc.subject damage control en_US
dc.title Surgical treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • MedEspera 2012
    The 4th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 17-19, 2012

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics