Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Colesnic, V.
dc.contributor.author Gurghis, R.
dc.contributor.author Tintari, St.
dc.contributor.author Bordian, V.
dc.date.accessioned 2022-02-03T07:22:27Z
dc.date.available 2022-02-03T07:22:27Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation COLESNIC, V., GURGHIS, R., TINTARI, St., BORDIAN, V. Therapeutic approach in splenic injuries. In: MedEspera: the 4th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2012, p. 166. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/19911
dc.description.abstract Introduction: A better knowledge of splenic functions and an increasing awareness of the postsplenectomy complications, the position towards splenic injuries (SI) approach has changed over time with the development of imaging techniques. Purpose: To analyze the management outcomes in SI. Material and Methods: There were 77 consecutive patients with SI, treated at the Emergency Hospital between 2008 and 2011. Male/Female ratio was 2,5:1. The overall mean age was 40 years. Blunt abdominal trauma prevailed in 74(96,10%) cases. The mechanism of injury was: falls - 44,74%, followed by motor vehicle accidents - 34,21%, assaults - 19,48%, spontaneous rupture of the spleen - 1,30%. Twentysix (33,77%) observations had an isolated SI, 3(3,90%) - multiple injuries, associated injuries - 62,34%. Associated injuries to the thorax (42,86%) were the most common, 31,17% presented right lower rib fractures. Thoracic lesions are followed by cranio-cerebral trauma with 14(18,18%) cases, limbs fractures - 13(16,88%), liver injury - 8(12,12%), kidney injury - 7(10,39%), hollow viscous injury - 7(10,39%), hip fractures - 8(12,12%), diaphragmatic tear - 3(3,90%) and pancreas injury - 2(2,60%). Shock was present on 33(42,86%) patients, of which 9(11,69%) - gr. III-IV. An abdominal US was performed in 67(87,01%) patients, sensitivity of FAST being 88,05%. The total number of 43(55,84%) patients had a CT scan, with a 95,35% sensitivity. Diagnostic laparoscopy constituted 44,16%, with a 76,47% sensitivity. Results: Forty-one (53,25%) patients had a surgery: either splenoectomy (n=36), or splenic conservation procedure (SCP) (n=5). SCP was performed using topical haemostatic agents (n=2) and splenorrhaphy (n=3). Postsplenoectomy period evolved with complications in 11(14,28%) patients, and 5 deaths. Of the 38 patients initially undergoing nonoperative management (NOM), NOM failed in 4 of them. Length of hospital stay averaged 11 days in the NOM group versus 14 days average in the operative management group. Conclusion: Currently, NOM approach has gained ground in the patients with splenic injuries. Its application removes the patient from the early and late complications associated wtih unnecessary laparotomy. Thereby it reduces the length of hospital stay and thus the cost of patients’ care, period of inactivity, social and family integration. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher State Medical and Pharmaceutical University Nicolae Testemitanu, Medical Students and Residents Association, Scientific Association of Students and Young Doctors en_US
dc.relation.ispartof MedEspera: The 4th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 17-19, 2012, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.subject spleen en_US
dc.subject injury en_US
dc.subject nonoperative management en_US
dc.subject organ-preserving procedure en_US
dc.title Therapeutic approach in splenic injuries en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • MedEspera 2012
    The 4th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 17-19, 2012

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics