Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Petriman, Daniela
dc.date.accessioned 2025-04-11T06:29:01Z
dc.date.available 2025-04-11T06:29:01Z
dc.date.issued 2024
dc.identifier.citation PETRIMAN, Daniela. Objective methods of refraction examination. In: The 19th SEEOS Congress: abstract book, Oct. 18-19th, 2024 / org. commit.: Eugeniu Bendelic [et al.]. Chişinău: CEP Medicina, 2024, p.16. ISBN 978-9975-82-393-7. en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-9975-82-393-7
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/30339
dc.description.abstract Introduction: Retinoscopy is an important method for the objective assessment of refraction, widely used for diagnosing vision disorders such as hyperopia, myopia, and astigmatism. Accurate refraction measurement is particularly important in children and school-age individuals, where the use of cycloplegia plays a key role in correct diagnosis. Studies show significant differences between retinoscopy with and without cycloplegia, especially in younger children. Objective of the Study: To evaluate the difference between the results of retinoscopy with and without cycloplegia in children, and to analyze the influence of age, refractive errors, and wearing glasses on these results. Materials and Method: Observational studies, cohort studies, and review articles were selected from recognized databases,such as PubMed, focusing on publications from the year 2019. The study included 128 children, divided into 4 age groups: 6-7, 8-9, 10-12, and 12-13 years. Each child underwent retinoscopy with cycloplegia (1% cyclopentolate) and without it. Accommodation was assessed using dynamic retinoscopy before applying cycloplegia. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the spherical values of retinoscopy with and without cycloplegia. The difference decreased with the age of the children, but retinoscopy with cycloplegia revealed greater hyperopia compared to non-cycloplegic results in all age groups. The difference was more pronounced in children with high hyperopia (≥+2.50D). The cylindrical component showed no significant differences between retinoscopy with and without cycloplegia. Non-cycloplegic retinoscopy with a result of ≥+1.50D was sensitive (87%) and specific (96%) in identifying clinically significant hyperopia (≥+2.50D). Conclusion: Retinoscopy with cycloplegia reveals significantly greater hyperopia compared to retinoscopy without cycloplegia in children aged 6 to 13. This difference is particularly pronounced in children with high hyperopia and is independent of wearing glasses or accommodation. Cycloplegia does not affect the cylindrical component but is necessary for accurately determining full refractive error in children, especially in cases of high hyperopia. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher CEP Medicina en_US
dc.relation.ispartof The 19th Edition of the South-East European Ophthalmological Society Congress. October 18-19th, 2024, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova en_US
dc.title Objective methods of refraction examination en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics