Abstract:
Introduction: Advances in microsurgery have allowed cataract surgery to evolve
from removal of the opaque lens to a procedure aimed at achieving the best
refractive outcome. As cataract surgery outcomes have improved, the use of surgery
as a refractive modality has become popular.
Refractive lens extraction is intended for correcting high-degree ametropias.
Another indication is correction of refractive errors in presbyopic patients with a
clear lens.
EDOF lenses maintain clear vision at both long and intermediate distances. They are
designed to minimize dependence on glasses, but can cause undesirable effects such
as glare and halos.
Aim of the Study: To evaluate the results of using EDOF IOLs for the correction of
high myopia and myopic astigmatism.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted at the Ophthalmologic center Eye
Microsurgery in Moldova, from January -December 2023. It was a retrospective
study examining data from 20 patients (32 eyes) who underwent refractive lens
extraction with the implantation of Sifi EDOF IOL. 7 were men and 13 were women,
with an average age of 39.05 years ± 8.38.
Inclusion criteria were: age ≥18 years at the time of surgery, high myopia (> -6.00D),
and myopic astigmatism, with a clear lens. Exclusion criteria included: irregular
astigmatism, keratoconus, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, uveitis, ocular infections.
Before surgery patients underwent a complete ocular examination: UDVA, CDVA,
refractometry, keratometry, slit lamp examination, IOP, endothelial cell count,
optical biometry to determine axial length and the dioptric power of the IOL, using
the fourth-generation Barrett Universal II formula. The targeted postoperative
refraction was emmetropia.
The surgery was performed by phacoemulsification. Postoperatively, patients
received topical treatment with Dexatobrom four times a day for one month.
Follow-up was conducted at one month. During visit UDVA, CDVA, UIVA, CIVA,
autorefractokeratometry, IOP were evaluated.
At the final follow-up visit, all patients were asked about the presence of discomfort
when looking at light sources in the evening and their satisfaction with distance and
intermediate visual acuity.
Results
Preoperative data:
- Mean UDVA: 0.02 ± 0.01
- Mean CDVA: 0.68 ± 0.25
