Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Allergies under the microscope of immunology: opportunities for screenin

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Toma, Cristina
dc.date.accessioned 2025-11-11T08:25:06Z
dc.date.available 2025-11-11T08:25:06Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.citation TOMA, Cristina. Allergies under the microscope of immunology: opportunities for screening. In: Imunologia pediatrică – de la fiziologie şi suspiciune de boală la diagnostic şi management diferenţiat. Materialele Conferinței naţionale cu participare internaţională dedicată aniversării de 80 de ani ai USMF "Nicolae Testemiţanu". Chișinău, 19 septembrie 2025, p. 57. ISBN 978-5-85748-224-7 (PDF). en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-5-85748-224-7 (PDF)
dc.identifier.isbn 978-5-85748-223-0
dc.identifier.uri https://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/31470
dc.description.abstract Introduction. Allergic diseases are increasingly prevalent worldwide and pose a major health burden. Early and accurate identification of atopy is crucial for timely management and for guiding subsequent diagnostic procedures. Conventional tests such as total IgE (tIgE) are limited by poor specificity, while specific IgE (sIgE) testing, though precise, is resource-intensive when used indiscriminately. Multiplex screening assays such as ImmunoCAP Phadiatop® and Phadiatop® Infant address these limitations by detecting IgE against panels of common allergens in a single assay. Aim of the study To evaluate the role of Phadiatop and Phadiatop Infant in allergology, comparing their diagnostic value with tIgE and sIgE, and assessing their usefulness as screening tools for further allergy testing. Material and methods A literature review was conducted focusing on 97 studies from 1988 to 2025 comparing Phadiatop and Phadiatop Infant with tIgE and sIgE in pediatric and adult cohorts. Diagnostic accuracy, predictive value, and clinical applicability were analyzed. Results Phadiatop and Phadiatop Infant showed superior sensitivity and specificity compared with tIgE for detecting sensitization. For example, in Pierotti Brazilian pediatric cohort, Phadiatop Infant demonstrated a higher positivity rate (72.6%) compared with Phadiatop Europe (63.8%). Lazova et al. reported predictive values up to 97.4% for combined multi-allergen screening panels in children, clearly outperforming tIgE. A negative Phadiatop result reliably excluded atopy, while positive results supported targeted follow-up with sIgE or skin prick testing. In selected cases, the next diagnostic step is Component-Resolved Diagnostics (CRD), which allows precise identification of the allergenic proteins involved and supports risk stratification and personalized management. Conclusion Phadiatop and Phadiatop Infant are valuable first-line screening tools in allergology. They enable cost-effective, rapid, and reliable identification of sensitized individuals, improve diagnostic efficiency compared with tIgE, and support rational application of sIgE testing. Their integration into diagnostic algorithms enhances early detection and guides a structured pathway toward advanced methods such as CRD, ensuring accurate and individualized allergy management. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Instituţia Publică Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie „Nicolae Testemiţanu” din Republica Moldova en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Imunologia pediatrică – de la fiziologie şi suspiciune de boală la diagnostic şi management diferenţiat. Conferință naţională cu participare internaţională dedicată aniversării de 80 de ani ai USMF "Nicolae Testemiţanu". Chișinău, 19 septembrie, 2025 en_US
dc.subject allergy screening en_US
dc.subject ImmunoCAP en_US
dc.subject Phadiatop en_US
dc.subject IgE en_US
dc.title Allergies under the microscope of immunology: opportunities for screenin en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics