Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Angle class I malocclusion. Principles of diagnosis and treatment

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Botnaru, Corina-Nicoleta
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-06T07:44:19Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-06T07:44:19Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation BOTNARU, Corina-Nicoleta. Angle class I malocclusion. Principles of diagnosis and treatment. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 355-356. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/11976
dc.description Ion Lupan Pediatric Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery and Pedodontics, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, The 8th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, September 24-26, 2020 en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction. Nowadays the importance of the smile is being extraordinarily important. The smile influences our mood, self confidence, thoughts and social relationships. Therefore, owners of an aesthetic smile are more prone to smile than those with dento-alveolar disharmonies. Following this aspect, one of the main reasons for the orthodontic treatment is the aesthetical one. Angle class I malocclusions are characterized by dental alignment disharmonies, when skeletal involvement is minor, presenting a normal antero-posterior intermaxillary relationship. Aim of the study. Etiopathogenic study, correct diagnosis and treatment of Angle class I malocclusion. Materials and methods.. A study was performed on 12 patients who had different degrees of severity of dento-maxillary crowding. For diagnostical purpose the following investigations were done: panoramic radiography (OPG), cephalometric and model analysis. An individual treatment plan was done for each patient. Two methods of treatment were selected: removable and fixed orthodontic appliances.Results. The treatment method was chosen according to severity degree and patient's age. Thus, 8 patients of 12 were treated through fixed appliances, while the other 4 persons were using removable orthodontic appliances. Cooperative patients during the growth period and that have no severe teeth crowding, have wore removable appliances for 9 to 12 months, while the others were treated through fixed adhesive system within about 1,5 years. Conclusions. Patients that wore removable appliances, followed by fixed appliances, achieved their aesthetic objectives, maximum intercuspation and a functional occlusion. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MedEspera en_US
dc.subject disharmony en_US
dc.subject Angle class I malocclusion en_US
dc.subject diagnosis en_US
dc.subject treatment en_US
dc.subject aesthetic en_US
dc.subject study en_US
dc.subject crowding en_US
dc.subject removable appliances en_US
dc.subject fixed appliances en_US
dc.subject dental alignement en_US
dc.title Angle class I malocclusion. Principles of diagnosis and treatment en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • MedEspera 2020
    The 8th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, September 24-26, 2020

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics