Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

The concept of ”benevolent injustice” in the newborn care

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cristal, Ana
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-08T09:21:38Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-08T09:21:38Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation CRISTAL, Ana. The concept of ”benevolent injustice” in the newborn care. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 319. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12010
dc.description Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, The 8th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, September 24-26, 2020 en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction. Neonatal medicine aims to reduce the mortality of infants. In the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), babies receive high-quality healthcare that in many cases saves lives. Even compared with only a decade ago, fewer and fewer infants are dying. There is a little-recognized cohort of NICU patients whose outcomes are the result of a “benevolent injustice” in their healthcare course. Many of these infants are saved by technology; however, they are left both medically fragile and medically dependent and many of them are required to live in a medical facility. Many of these babies never get to go home with their parents. This emerging cohort of patients may evolve from the difficult ability to prognosticate outcomes for neonates, overtreatment, and acquiescing to parental demands for continued aggressive care. Aim of the study. Examination of the concept of benevolent injustice in the context of NICU patients. Materials and methods. Review of the scientific literature and integration of available qualitative empirical data. Results. There are 3 recurrent themes that emerge in the literature as to how this cohort of NICU patients evolves: poor prognostication, overtreatment, and acquiescing to parental demands for continued aggressive care. Neonatologists and parents are attempting to benevolently make decisions in neonates’ best interests, which, unfortunately, can be quite difficult when predicting the potential outcomes. Whether by poor prognostication or by over treating neonates to acquiesce to parental demands, these actions carry with them the potential consequence of violating the neonate’s rights to a range of opportunities. Neonates should have the right or opportunity to interact and to be in relationship with their parents, and these are opportunities that should be protected rather than violated by health-care. If their conditions are life-limiting or death is near, they should be allowed to die with dignity in a loving and symptom-free manner. Many neonates are left neurologically impaired and developmentally delayed where it may never be possible to interact in a meaningful way. Conclusions. The reality of the NICU is that the same technology that is used to save a neonate’s life may also be the cause of severe comorbidities and life-altering, adverse side effects. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MedEspera en_US
dc.subject benevolent en_US
dc.subject injustice en_US
dc.subject neonates en_US
dc.subject prognostication en_US
dc.title The concept of ”benevolent injustice” in the newborn care en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • MedEspera 2020
    The 8th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, September 24-26, 2020

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics