Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Alternative implantation in the early rehabilitation of patients with upper jaw atrophy

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Eni, Stanislav
dc.contributor.author Strîșca, Stanislav
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-08T14:47:53Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-08T14:47:53Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.identifier.citation ENI, Stanislav, STRÎȘCA, Stanislav. Alternative implantation in the early rehabilitation of patients with upper jaw atrophy. In: MedEspera: the 8th Internat. Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2020, p. 328. en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://medespera.asr.md/wp-content/uploads/ABSTRACT-BOOK.pdf
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/12019
dc.description Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Arsenie Gutan, Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova, The 8th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, September 24-26, 2020 en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction. In the implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of patients, clinicians often meet extremely difficult situations, when the bone support in the lateral areas of the jaws is insufficient for implant insertion. Under these conditions, alternative implantation methods were proposed, which were hardly accepted, but the success demonstrated over time determines the frequent use of the methods. Aim of the study. To enhance the effectiveness of early rehabilitation of patients with maxillary atrophy by using alternative implantation. Materials and methods.. This study was axed on 48 patients (21 women and 27 males) aged 28-67 years, conducted between 2016 and 2020 at the SRL “OMNI DENT”. CT scans and OPG were taken in all patients before and after implant placement. In 41 cases implants were inserted using “Fast and Fixed” protocol, in other 7 cases zygomatic implants were used. Results. In all 48 cases a high primary stability of implants was achieved and all the patients were rehabilitated with temporary implant supported overdenture on the 4.17-th day in mean (std.dev 1.23). In 3 cases implant supported overdenture fixation was delayed to 10-th and 12- th day. In total 255 implants were inserted, of which 2 was lost during the osseointegration. The success rate of this procedure was 99.2%. In total 21 Zygomatic implants were inserted with 100% success rate. Conclusions. The use of alternative implantation in early rehabilitation of patients, even though, is an effective and predictable method with a high rate of success, is technique sensitive, surgeon has to be experienced based on good preoperative planning. The main advantages are: early rehabilitation, less invasive, avoiding bone grafting procedure, reduced costs, all this helps to raise the patient’s quality of life. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MedEspera en_US
dc.subject alternative en_US
dc.subject zygomatic implant en_US
dc.subject early rehabilitation en_US
dc.title Alternative implantation in the early rehabilitation of patients with upper jaw atrophy en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • MedEspera 2020
    The 8th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, September 24-26, 2020

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics