Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment options of abfraction lesions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rubinov, Ariel
dc.contributor.author Ababii, Victoria
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-08T13:11:24Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-08T13:11:24Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation RUBINOV, Ariel, ABABII, Victoria. Etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment options of abfraction lesions: [poster]. In: Conferinţa ştiinţifică anuală "Cercetarea în biomedicină și sănătate: calitate, excelență și performanță", 20-22 octombrie 2021: culegere de postere. 2021, p. 219. en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/19329
dc.description Odontology, Periodontology and Oral Pathology chair, Faculty of Stomatology en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction. Abfraction lesions are noncarious cervical lesions that affect structural integrity, retention of dental plaque, tooth sensitivity, pulpal vitality and esthetics. The pathogenesis of NCCLs is considered to be multifactorial, with occlusal loading, biocorrosion in combination with cervical stress stemming from hyperfunctional or parafunctional occlusal forces, acting synergistically rather than in isolation. The way in which abfraction lesions are restored and managed depends on the etiology and risk factors. Purpose. To establish the therapeutical treatment strategy of abfraction lesions. Material and methods. 9 patients, 6 men and 3 women, between the ages of 26-63, were questioned and examined. The diagnosis of abfractions lesions was established according to careful history taking and proper clinical examination. Results. From 9 patients examined , 3 (33,3 %) patients presented generalized abfraction lesions with the association with chronic marginal generalized periodontitis and 6 (67,7%) patients with localized abfraction lesions, from them 2 patients (33,3%) with unidental edentations and 4 patients (67,7%) with occlusal interferences. 6 patients with localized lesions presented the involvement of 13 teeth. From these teeth 10 (76,9 %) were premolars (4 upper and 6 lower), 3 (23,1 %) incisors (2 central lower and 1 lateral lower). As restorative treatment, 4 patients received microfilled composite resin materials, 4 – nanohybrid composite resin materials, 1 - glass ionomer ciment. Conclusions. 1.Abfractions lesions have a multifactorial etiology, the most important being occlusal stress, erosive tooth wear or an association of these factors. 2.A careful history taking and proper clinical examination are mandatory to reach at a correct diagnosis and a differential diagnosis. 3.Therapeutical treatment of abfraction lesions involves problem identification, diagnosis, etiological factor removal or treatment and, if necessary, restoration. Materials with a low elastic modulus that will accommodate tooth flexure - such as microfilled, nanohybrid or nanofilled composite resin, glass ionomer or resin modified glass ionomer - are a good choice for restoring abfraction lesions. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Universitatea de Stat de Medicină şi Farmacie "Nicolae Testemiţanu" din Republica Moldova en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Conferinţa ştiinţifică anuală "Cercetarea în biomedicină și sănătate: calitate, excelență și performanță", 20-22 octombrie 2021 en_US
dc.subject abfraction lesions en_US
dc.subject noncarious lesions en_US
dc.subject restorative treatment en_US
dc.title Etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment options of abfraction lesions en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics