dc.contributor.author |
Esir, Svetlana |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-06-10T11:40:57Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-06-10T11:40:57Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
ESIR, Svetlana. The consequence of an error in the interpretation of the radiological diagnosis prior to the preparation for oral implantology. Case presentation. In: MedEspera: the 9th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2022, p. 371. ISBN 978-9975-3544-2-4. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-9975-3544-2-4 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://medespera.asr.md/en/books |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/21001 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Introduction. X-ray studies are an important component in the examination of patients before, during and
after implantation. The tasks of X-ray examination are to correctly assess the state and parameters of the
proposed implantation site in order to avoid unforeseen situations during surgery and postoperative
complications, as well as timely detection of changes in the position of the implant and the state of the
surrounding parts of the dento-alveolar system when observed in dynamics.
Case presentation. Patient E.F., 44 years old, non-smoker, with no chronic conditions, came in 6 months
ago with complaints of chewing difficulties due to the absence of lateral teeth. After a clinical and
paraclinical examination, including X-ray methods (OPG, CBCT), the established diagnosis was:
secondary partial edentulism of the mandible, class II in the Kennedy classification, due to caries and its
complications.
Discussion. In order to help the patient, it was decided to insert two implants in the area of missing teeth
3.6 and 3.7, with a preliminary CBCT. The next day following implantation, the patient came in
complaining about a lack of sensitivity in the area of the third quadrant. The immediate x-ray examination
revealed the localization of the dental implant directly in the lumen of the mandibular canal. On the same
day, the implant was removed from the lumen of the mandibular canal, a consultation and treatment with a
neurologist was scheduled. 6 months after surgery, good dynamics are observed, the function of the
damaged nerve is restored.
Conclusion. After injury, complete regeneration of the nerve is possible in the absence of prolonged
exposure to the traumatic agent. Therefore, it is imperative to diagnose the possible complications as
quickly as possible, with the subsequent initiation of the corresponding treatment which is aimed at
restoring the anatomical integrity and functional viability of the inferior alveolar nerve. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy of the Republic of Moldova, Association of Medical Students and Residents |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof |
MedEspera: The 9th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2022, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova |
en_US |
dc.title |
The consequence of an error in the interpretation of the radiological diagnosis prior to the preparation for oral implantology |
en_US |
dc.type |
Other |
en_US |