dc.contributor.author |
Melenciuc, Maxim |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-06-15T09:35:45Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-06-15T09:35:45Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2022 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
MELENCIUC, Maxim. Free forearm perforator mini flaps in fingers reconstruction. In: MedEspera: the 9th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors: abstract book. Chișinău: S. n., 2022, p. 413. ISBN 978-9975-3544-2-4. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-9975-3544-2-4 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://medespera.asr.md/en/books |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/21116 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Introduction. The reconstruction of fingers' soft tissue defects remains challenging. The optimal
reconstructive treatment should be simple, reliable, cost effective, and provide pliable, sensitive, and
cosmetically similar tissue allowing adequate function. A free flap of appropriate size may provide an ideal
surgical solution.
Aim of study. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of fingers' reconstruction using free
arterialized venous flap (AVF), superficial palmar branch of the radial artery (SUPBRA) flap, dorsal radial
perforator flap (DRAP), and dorsal ulnar artery perforator (DUAP) flap harvested from the same donor
area.
Methods and materials. During 6 months 4 types of free flaps from the same extremity for the coverage
of fingers' defects were performed, with small/moderate soft tissue lack (1 AVFs, 3 SUPBRA flaps, 1
DRAPs, and 1 DUAP flaps). Standardised assessment of outcomes was performed, including duration of
operation, objective sensory recovery, cold intolerance, time of returning to work, active total range of
motion (ROM) of the injured fingers, and the cosmetic appearance of the donor/recipient sites.
Results. All flaps survived completely, and the follow-up duration was 12 months. The average length of
the surgery for the AVFs was distinctly shorter in comparison to other types. The SUPBRA were employed
to reconstruct skin defects and extensor tendon defects using a vascularized palmaris longus graft in 1
finger. Optimal sensory recovery was better with AVFs and SUPBRA flaps as compared with DUAPs and
DRAP flaps. No significant differences were noted in ROM or cold intolerance between the 4 types of
flaps. Optimal cosmetic satisfaction was noted for the recipient sites of AVFs and the donor sites of
SUPBRA flaps.
Conclusion. All four types of free flaps from the ipsilateral extremity are a practical choice in finger
reconstruction for small/moderate-sized defects. The SUBPRAs play an important role in such operations
due to the wider indications, and better sensory recovery and cosmetic appearance associated with this
method. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy of the Republic of Moldova, Association of Medical Students and Residents |
en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof |
MedEspera: The 9th International Medical Congress for Students and Young Doctors, May 12-14, 2022, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova |
en_US |
dc.title |
Free forearm perforator mini flaps in fingers reconstruction |
en_US |
dc.type |
Other |
en_US |