Institutional Repository in Medical Sciences
(IRMS – Nicolae Testemițanu SUMPh)

Agent-based modeling of fluid dynamics in lung tissue engineering

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Iapăscurtă, Victor
dc.date.accessioned 2025-05-05T11:41:03Z
dc.date.available 2025-05-05T11:41:03Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.identifier.citation IAPĂSCURTĂ, Victor. Agent-based modeling of fluid dynamics in lung tissue engineering. In: Cells and tissues transplantation. Actualities and perspectives. The 3rd edition : The Materials of the National Scientific Conference with international participation dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the founding of Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy. Chisinau, March 21-22, 2025: [abstracts]. Chişinău: CEP Medicina, 2025, p. 44. ISBN 978-9975-82-413-2. en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-9975-82-413-2
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.usmf.md/handle/20.500.12710/30460
dc.description.abstract Introduction: In tissue engineering for lung applications, understanding and controlling fluid dynamics within engineered constructs is paramount. Agent-based modeling (ABM) offers a powerful framework to simulate complex physiological systems, yet its application to pulmonary edema (PE) in this context remains underexplored. This study presents an innovative ABM, built in NetLogo, to simulate cardiogenic PE (CPE) by modeling extravascular lung water dynamics under hydrostatic pressure (HP) and oncotic pressure (OP). This model can serve as a tool to inform the design of tissueengineered lung constructs by providing insights into fluid management strategies. Materials and Methods: The ABM was developed using NetLogo, employing a simplified Starling equation: Q = k (HP - OP). The model's spatial environment includes capillary, alveolar-capillary membrane (ACM), and alveoli, with agents representing water molecules and macromolecules. Two scenarios were simulated: (1) Normal: HP = 18 mmHg, OP = 25 mmHg, (2) CPE: HP = 22 mmHg, OP = 24 mmHg. Results: In the normal scenario, the model achieved a physiological balance with approximately 200 ml of extravasation cleared. In the CPE scenario, there was significant fluid accumulation (>400 ml by ~40 ticks). Adjusting parameters, such as reducing OP, amplified the edema, demonstrating the model's flexibility. The model is available at: https://modelingcommons.org/browse/one_model/5103#model_tabs_browse_info. Conclusions: This ABM provides a valuable platform for tissue engineers to understand and manipulate fluid dynamics in lung constructs. By simulating the effects of different pressure gradients and permeability, it can guide the development of biomaterials and scaffolds that optimize fluid handling in engineered lung tissues. The model's extensibility allows for future incorporation of additional complexities, such as gas exchange and variable tissue properties, enhancing its utility in both research and practical applications. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher CEP Medicina en_US
dc.relation.ispartof Cells and tissues transplantation. Actualities and perspectives. The 3-rd edition. Chisinau, March 21-22, 2025 en_US
dc.subject Tissue engineering en_US
dc.subject Agent-based modeling en_US
dc.subject Pulmonary edema en_US
dc.subject Fluid dynamics en_US
dc.subject Hydrostatic pressure en_US
dc.subject Oncotic pressure en_US
dc.title Agent-based modeling of fluid dynamics in lung tissue engineering en_US
dc.type Other en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics